JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 27, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Martha Victoria Sáchica Méndez

✓Claimant Lorenza Velasquez  Rodriguez

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica contra el auto proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub para rechazar la demanda de la referencia, por cuanto en el escrito de subsanación no se realizaron las correcciones solicitadas.

La Sala Plena concluye que el demandante omitió subsanar los defectos advertidos en el auto de inadmisión y decide CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del seis (06) de agosto de dos mil catorce (2014), proferido por el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, dentro del expediente D-10329, mediante el cual rechazo la demanda presentada por la ciudadana Lorenza Velasquez Rodriguez en contra de un aparte del articulo 102 de la Ley 1687 de 2013.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia a la peticionaria, informandole que contra ella no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decision, archivese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.